欢迎访问 武汉桑拿导航网!

A recent move by US Secretary of State Pompeo, US Embassy in

作者:admin日期:

分类:123/都市资讯/

Original title: The house that has been bought for 17 years suddenly has no house and has not been transferred. In the property division between the former homeowner and the ex-wife, after the house was given to his ex-wife and then sold to a colleague to get the real estate license, Mr. Li I have been reminded to transfer the account many times, and the other party has been shirking. In 2017, Mr. Li asked his colleagues to transfer the house. The colleague asked him to get 100,000 yuan in compensation. After the negotiation, both parties agreed to compensate 80,000 yuan. The house was awarded to the ex-wife of the colleague and was sold to another person by the ex-wife of the colleague on the second day after the judgment took effect. Mr. Li felt that the main refund of the housing and interest in the front room could not purchase the property that matched the value of the house involved. The former homeowner should compensate.

"I bought the old man's house for the elderly. I have lived for 17 years. As a result, the former homeowner and the couple have a property division lawsuit, and the house suddenly disappeared!" On May 28, Zhengzhou citizen Li went to Dahe newspaper and Dahe client. The reporter reported that in 2002, he purchased a part of the unit (house-to-house) from his colleagues at a price of 66,000 yuan. When the property procedures were completed, colleagues were reluctant to transfer, and they also asked for compensation after the house was appreciated. When he repeatedly communicated with his colleagues about the transfer of housing, he was suing, and his colleague’s lawyer suddenly took out a divorce property division judgment, so that the house he bought for 17 years was transferred to another buyer.

Narrative: Payment for 17 years in the house, the former homeowner is late but on the morning of May 28th, Dahebao·Dahe client reporter saw Mr. Li and his lawyer at the intersection of Jinshui Road and Zhongzhou Avenue in Zhengzhou City. Mr. Wang. Mr. Li told the reporter that in 2002, in order to facilitate the care of the elderly, he purchased a set of housing (house reform) located in the unit of No. 6 of Chenxu Road, Jinshui District, at a price of 66,000 yuan from his colleagues. Colleagues signed a housing transaction agreement, delivered all the money, and colleagues promised to go through the transfer procedures after getting the real estate license.

"In 2004, after my colleague got the real estate license, I repeatedly urged him to handle the transfer, but he has been shirking. Because they are all colleagues in the office, I have never thought of tearing my face, so I have been dragged. Mr. Li said that until 2017, his colleagues still did not mention the transfer of the house, he once again found a colleague to communicate, and his colleague asked him to pay 100,000 yuan in compensation. Mr. Li said that when a colleague made such a request, he still took care of his colleagues' relationship and communicated with his colleagues. He promised to give him 80,000 yuan in compensation, and his colleagues agreed. Mutation: is about to sue for rights, a property division judgment makes the house sold to others

"Looking at my colleagues repeatedly dismissed, in order to defend my rights, I filed a lawsuit in the Jinshui District Court. At the time of the trial, the other party's entrusted lawyer took out a property division judgment and let me and my lawyer be on the spot!" Mr. Li said. The verdict provided by the other party’s lawyer is a judgment on a civil marriage property dispute, and the property that was judged is the house he purchased from his colleague. Today, the house he bought for the elderly was awarded to his colleague's ex-wife and was sold to another person by his colleague's ex-wife on the second day of the judgment. They have been checked and verified by the housing management department.

In the hands of Mr. Li, the reporter saw the civil judgment made by the People's Court of Guancheng District of Zhengzhou City (2018) Yu 0104 Minchu No. 3065. Among them, the plaintiff of the judgment was Ms. Chen and the defendant was Mr. Ji. The judgment stated that the plaintiff, Ms. Chen and the defendant, Mr. Ji, had a set of houses in No. 6 of Chenxu Road, Jinshui District during the marriage period. The real estate value is now 800,000 yuan. The property certificate has not been processed during the divorce. Split. The final judgment is as follows. The property registered at No. 6 Chenxu Road, Jinshui District, under the name of Mr. Ji, is owned by the plaintiff, Ms. Chen. The plaintiff, Ms. Chen, paid the defendant Mr. Ji a house compensation of 400,000 yuan within 10 days after the effective date of this judgment...

"Because they are all an office, I know that my colleague was married to my ex-wife in 1999, and I still agreed to divorce. That is the case, I bought a colleague's house." Mr. Li said that the house has now been The colleague's ex-wife sold it to another person. Response: The former homeowner claimed that the house had been awarded to his ex-wife and sold it to others. On May 28, the reporter contacted Mr. Ji, a colleague of Mr. Li. According to Mr. Ji, this house is indeed a house that he had acquired during his marriage with his ex-wife, so he is the common property of his ex-wife, and his ex-wife, Ms. Chen, actually sued him to the court and asked to split the house. And the house has been awarded to his ex-wife and sold to another buyer.

As for why I sold the house to Mr. Li before, and I have never handled the transfer? Mr. Ji said that because the house is the common property of his wife and his ex-wife, his ex-wife did not agree to sell to Mr. Li, and he signed the sale agreement alone. Therefore, I have never been involved in the transfer of housing with Mr. Li. He also planned to take back the house after selling the house. It was Mr. Li who had been shirking and refused to move out. When he signed a housing transaction agreement with Mr. Li, he also suggested that if he could not get the real estate license, he would refund Mr. Li's full house payment and interest.

Regarding the situation mentioned by Mr. Ji, the reporter actually saw in Article 9 of the Housing Exchange Agreement provided by Mr. Li’s lawyer. “If the real estate license is not available, the property cannot be transferred to Party B (Mr. Li’s father-in-law ), Party A (Mr. Ji) shall refund all the room and interest." On May 28th and 29th, the reporter tried to contact Ms. Chen through the lawyers of Mr. Ji and Ms. Chen, and turned around, but she never found the contact information of Ms. Chen. Saying: The refunded house and interest cannot purchase the property that matches the value of the house involved, and the former homeowner should compensate

In the interview, Mr. Ji’s statement, Mr. Li’s lawyer, Mr. Wang, raised the suspicion that Mr. Ji and Ms. Chen were divorced in 1999. Mr. Li’s purchase time for the elderly was 2002. It is also based on this that Mr. Li’s father-in-law I signed a purchase contract with Mr. Ji. And even if Mr. Ji claimed that the house involved was a joint property of the husband and wife, Mr. Ji’s unilateral sale was still valid because, according to the provisions of Article 3 of the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court’s sales contract, Mr. Ji’s transfer of the shared house was not due to the disposition. And invalid.

"As for Mr. Ji, he is only willing to compensate Mr. Li and his father-in-law for the purchase of house and interest, which cannot be established." Wang said that in combination with the case, even the so-called house that was provided by Mr. Ji was transferred again. The evidence is true. Mr. Ji’s income is far greater than returning only Mr. Li and his father-in-law have paid for the purchase of house and interest. The law cannot support malicious acts, otherwise the foundation of social integrity will be destroyed. At the same time, Article 131 of the Contract Law also stipulates that if the party breaches the contract and causes losses to the other party, it shall bear the liquidated damages equivalent to the amount of damage caused to the other party. Mr. Li and his family’s elderly are obviously unable to purchase and invest in the house and interest returned by Mr. Ji. For the property with the same value of the house, Mr. Li and his family members have the right to ask Mr. Ji to bear the full cost of the new house purchased in accordance with the location, area and quality of the house involved.

In addition, according to Mr. Wang, when he inquired about the case in which Mr. Chen sued Mr. Ji for the division of common property in the Chengcheng District Court, he found that there were many alterations in the power of attorney submitted by Ms. Chen, and Ms. Chen provided the Beijing household registration status in this case. The information has been cancelled, but Ms. Chen has provided the court with the proof of Beijing identity in the two lawsuits initiated by Zhengzhou. In the hands of Wang, the reporter saw a print-up of the information on Ms. Chen’s resident population in Beijing. The logout sign indicates that the logout has been cancelled, but the reason and time for cancellation are blank. In this regard, the reporter also telephoned the Sun Judge of the People's Court of Guancheng District, who was in charge of the case. According to Sun’s judge, he has been unclear about this case because he has too many cases to be heard each year.

Lawyer Wang said that in his investigation of the case, he not only found out that Ms. Chen provided the court with the document of the cancelled identity, and even found out the location of Mr. Ji’s fictitious address. They have made a written application for the case of the discovery and submitted it to the Zhengzhou Intermediate People's Court. At the same time, he and his client Mr. Li are still in legal proceedings to protect their legitimate rights and interests. On May 29, the reporter called the Zhengzhou Intermediate People's Court. According to the relevant staff of the hospital, the judge in charge of the case is participating in the training and cannot be contacted. If the application materials and the case have already arrived in the hands of their judges in the Intermediate People's Court, their judges will seriously investigate and handle them impartially.

US Secretary of State Pompeo. Figure / US Embassy in the United States US Secretary of State Pompeo's recent move, causing media attention. The US State Department confirmed on Saturday that Pompeo, who is visiting four European countries, will attend the Bilderberg meeting in the Swiss town of Montreux. This meeting is also seen as a secret meeting held in Europe and the United States. The Bilderberg Conference has long been a mystery, people are curious and speculative about it, and even say it is like a mysterious organization that manipulates the world.

I. The privatization of the forum The misunderstanding of the Bilderberg meeting was largely due to the high status of the participants in the conference, and the conference itself was extremely low-key. But if you read the official website of the Bilderberg conference, you will find that it is really not so mysterious, and even the organizers are still very troubled. The Bilderberg Conference began in 1954 and it has always claimed to be an annual informal discussion forum, not a mysterious organization, nor a club. Once we have "clubed" it in terms of wording, then we understand it and the forum.

Some media said that the official website of the forum was "simple" and the text was "proud". But it is because it really has nothing to say, and it can be said almost completely. The Bilderberg Conference website emphasized that it has never sought public attention. According to the official website, the annual press conference held on the eve of the meeting lasted for several decades and continued until the 1990s. However, due to the lack of interest of the public, the list of participants, main topics and venues were always in every meeting. All announced a few days ago.

The official website is afraid of people's dissatisfaction, and then fills in a question that many people often ask - why is the security level so high? Because "some participants have always had security needs." Think about it. For example, this time Pompeo came, it is a strange thing not to improve the security level. In addition, the costs of the Forum Secretariat are all covered by private donations, and the reception costs for the annual meeting are borne by the members of the Steering Committee of the host country, and participants participate in private capacity at their own expense. Since the meeting was privatized, it did not use the public funds of any country at all, and of course there was no need to disclose the contents of the meeting to the public.

A lot of news took the official visit of Pompeo to say things, pointing out that his trip did not mention that he would attend the meeting, suggesting that Pompeo deliberately kept secret. A private meeting, of course, can not be on the official itinerary, otherwise it is really public and private, and there is suspicion of taking public money for personal matters. The forum's official website has repeatedly explained why its "transparency" is low, "to ensure that all participants can speak freely in a trusted environment." The official website emphasized that the meeting adopted the “Cathham Building Rules”. In accordance with this rule, participants are free to use the materials collected at the meeting, but may not disclose the identity of the speaker or trace its source.

There is a very popular story about the Bilderberg Conference. In 2000, the meeting was held in Genval, a small town near Brussels, Belgium. The local mayor was woken up by the callers of the meeting and said with amazement: "You are joking, if the Dutch queen and Henry Kissinger come here, I How could it not be notified?” On November 8, 2018, former US Secretary of State Kissinger visited Peking University. Figure / Peking University official WeChat In fact, even if the Queen or Kissinger arrived, the mayor should not be notified according to strict personalization requirements.

Second, from the traditional aristocratic forum, why did the Bilderberg meeting have to operate in accordance with the "Chatham Building Rules", many international conferences are not open and transparent? This is actually a serious misunderstanding of international affairs in the contemporary media. The emergence of today’s generally open and transparent international activities is only a new phenomenon in human society. Before the 20th century in Europe, aristocratic diplomacy or secret diplomacy prevailed. Diplomatic disclosure was proposed by the US President Wilson in the fourteen-point plan in the last century, and gradually became the norm of state exchange activities.

Even so, secret diplomacy has never left international politics. The reason is also very simple. Many times, leaders or diplomats have to bargain in places that the public can't see. The secret, away from the spotlight of the media, is often an important condition for guaranteeing the success of diplomatic negotiations. In many diplomatic situations, the media is often involved in the beginning of the meeting of officials, and the results of the meeting are announced. The core part of the meeting is away from the eyes of the media and the public.

The Bilderberg meeting was originally presented by the Queen of the Netherlands, Prince Bernhard, and invited elites to the Bilderberg Hotel in the Netherlands. The style of the beginning of this meeting was aristocratic, which is in line with the traditional European diplomatic approach. However, the participants of the original aristocratic diplomacy were kings, princes, and ministers. Now they are replaced by elites in the business, political, press, and academic circles. In fact, the content of the talks has not changed and become the identity of the participants. They do not. Then the people of the court.

Third, there is no "global shadow government", only the legend of catching the wind and the shadows Some people say that the Bilderberg Conference manipulates the state and world politics, and is the "global shadow government." This statement is too exaggerated and overstated. One of the arguments for this argument is that some of the participants will be presidents and prime ministers next year, such as Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and George Robertson, who was elected NATO Secretary-General the following year. This is nothing to be surprised. Because every year, 130 conferences attended by the world's elites are selected, if these people do not have any major achievements in the following year, they are not elites. The meeting is held once a year, and the participants are frequently changed. They are all top elites. In this way, the probability that the participants will be elected president, prime minister and secretary-general in the following year is not high. After all, the general elections of countries are usually just one of these people.

People who hold the "shadow government" theory either rely on speculation or deliberately speculate. Instead, they are true participants. This is not an interesting phenomenon. In addition to the Bilderberg meeting, "the squad", "Masonics", "Roman Club", etc. are not also depicted in the rumors? This is actually a kind of enlargement of people's unknown things and worship of mysterious things. The more we don't understand, the more we feel that it is very bad. We walked in and saw it, and that is what happened.

Of course, it is said that the Bilderberg meeting has no effect, and it is too small. After all, the weight of the people attending the meeting is different. The discussion will have an impact on their thoughts or behaviors, which in turn will touch the world political or economic policy. Although there are no formal resolutions at the meeting, the universal influence on the participants is internal and invisible. In short, as far as the Bilderberg Conference is concerned, this is not a “global shadow government”. Some are just legends of people catching the wind and catching the shadows. It is by no means an ineffective dialogue hall – the private elite forum is not allowed. The real effect of Xiao Yan.
本文标签:

相关阅读

  • 心累了,请去旅行一次!

  • admin旅游在线
  • Recently turned over a circle of friends and found that many people have disappeared. I started thinking that I was too shameless and deleted me. The result is still open to see one or two pieces of information, but there are only a few. It
关键词不能为空
极力推荐

聚合标签

关于我们 联系我们